Analyzing the Syllogisms

all told college students are required to develop for a Humanities class. full of life Thinking is a Humanities class. either college students take Critical Thinking.This syllogism is inductive. I guess this to be true because cardinal of the premises is probable it is possible for the closing to be false. Students may take a humanity class other than fine meaning. I do not think this syllogism is deductively logical because one of the premises may not be true and that could make the conclusion is false. The premises are all(prenominal) college students are required to take a Humanities class, and all college students take Critical Thinking. The conclusion is critical thinking is a humanities class. Syllogism 2All college students study. Ernie is a college student. Therefore, Ernie studies. This syllogism is deductive. I believe this to be true because it is formed from ecumenic to particular and general truth applies. This syllogism is deductively legal because the pre mises are true make the conclusion to be true. Premises All college students study and Ernie is a college student. Conclusion, Therefore, Ernie studies.Syllogism 3All college students attend class. Cindy attends class. Therefore, Cindy is a college student. This syllogism is deductive. This is deductive because the conclusion is true establish on premises that are true or accepted as true. This is deductively valid because all true premises conduct to a true conclusion. Premises All college students attend class and Cindy attends class. Conclusion Therefore, Cindy is a college student.Syllogism 4Two girls submit an assignment, The 2 submissions are identical, Therefore, two girls worked together on their assignment.